Which would you recommend?

Got something to say?

Which would you recommend?

Postby mikex » Wed May 13, 2009 1:43 pm

Celemony Melodyne Studio 8 or Auto Tune Evo?


I find Evo to be harder to use and I'm looking for a simpler solution for every day tuning.. I'll still use Evo for effects and 'hardcore' tuning for people who need a little extra help.
mikex
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:23 am
Location: Buffalo, NY

Postby brianhaverkate » Wed May 13, 2009 2:32 pm

I prefer the programs "Hard Work in Rehearsal 1.0" and "Vocal Training 2.0" :)

I've heard Melodyne is all the rage with the college kids though.
Brian Haverkate

Michigan State Accafellas (1996-1998) www.msuaccafellas.com
Florida State All-Night Yahtzee (1998-2001) www.allnightyahtzee.com
brianhaverkate
RARB
RARB
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 7:56 am
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Postby davecharliebrown » Wed May 13, 2009 2:49 pm

I see what you did there.
--Dave Brown

Image

now: Mouth Off host | ICCA & CARA Judge

then: CASA president, CASAcademy director, CASA Bd of Directors | BYU Vocal Point | Noteworthy co-foun
davecharliebrown
 
Posts: 849
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:39 pm
Location: Salt Lake City

Postby MarkHines » Wed May 13, 2009 7:52 pm

I think they both have their places, Mike. Melodyne does more than just tune, and Autotune seems to have become more of an "effect" than an editing tool, though I'm sure many use it for quick tuning fixes (or even detail-oriented, mission-critical tuning scenarios). If you're looking for a plugin to create effects with, I would say get Autotune, but if you're looking for a standalone editing suite, Melodyne FTW :-)
Mark Hines
The Vocal Company
www.thevocalcompany.com

Executive Producer, SoJam 2010
CASA Board of Directors
MarkHines
 
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:13 pm
Location: Raleigh-Durham, NC

Postby billhare » Thu May 14, 2009 2:09 am

...and I would say exactly the opposite that Mark just said. It's whatever works best for you, and luckily you can demo just about everything out there to find that answer. I find Melodyne to not be as transparent as AutoTune - I just don't like the way Melodyne sounds, what it does to the waveform, whereas careful AutoTuning just sounds like, well, singing.
billhare
 
Posts: 1913
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 11:14 am
Location: Silicon Valley, CA

Postby mrmiller » Fri May 15, 2009 11:27 am

I'll echo Bill here. I find Melodyne much easier to use for large numbers of tracks, but I think Auto-Tune sounds significantly better, whether it's transparent tuning or for the glitchy effect.
Michael R Miller
MIT Logarhythms, Musical Director '07-'08
mrmiller
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:02 pm

Postby jthelegend » Fri May 15, 2009 7:35 pm

not that bill needs another co-signer, but i definitely prefer the sound of autotune (especially if you're gonna be tuning leads), but i think what matters most is what you plan to use it most for...i.e if your main function is tuning/editing all the backing vocals to perfection [with track counts that can get well into the hundreds....] then autotune is probably not your baby, but for tuning things that *need* to sound more "natural", you'll probably want autotune.

or, i would actually recommend just having both so that you can make a determination of the appropriate tool when the time comes...i mean, you can still get academic discounts mike, so if i'm not mistaken you can get both programs for the same price (or maybe slightly more) than just buying either of them standalone for full price.
j. cannon
Cornell Chordials::2004-2007::
the panic room::producer-engineer::
member of the VocalSource network
jthelegend
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 1:42 pm


Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests